I voted yes. I think they should be restricted to a point. Not all the way gone just not everyone being an awper. Maybe it'll get some new people not scared to enter the server with a bunch of crazy awesome awpers.
Just my two cents.
-Noogyman![]()
yes restrict the awp.
no leave shit alone.
I need everyones input on this so that we can make the D2 server a place that people will want to play in more.
I voted yes. I think they should be restricted to a point. Not all the way gone just not everyone being an awper. Maybe it'll get some new people not scared to enter the server with a bunch of crazy awesome awpers.
Just my two cents.
-Noogyman![]()
Hey All I'm NoogyMan! You Only Wish You Were Me, But That's Understandable.....Alpha Phi Omega"National Service Fraternity"Pi Omicron ChapterBrother Name : Mister Deeds
yeah i was just thinking like cutting them back to like 3 per team.
Ditto to what noogy said, i know before D2 used to restrict awps based on how many players are on the server per team. It should be like that, keeps it fair and balanced.
Only problem is it pisses off the awp whores when the newer players buy the awps faster.
-dotty
[COLOR="RoyalBlue"][B]N/U Retiree[/B]
8:45 PM - V A N E S S A: give me a sex
2:53 PM - Tara Ann ت: just wanted to say you're adorable[/COLOR]
serves them right for failing to not have it binded. at least in the buy menu.
my own thoughts would be to limit awps to 3 per team AT THE MOST if it's like 10 on a team. otherwise, limit it to 1 or 2 per team depending on numbers. i've played on a few servers where they allow 2 per team no matter how many ppl are on. it was never really an issue and was almost always full. even at like 3 in the morning. just me thoughts, eh?![]()
[url=http://www.finalbattleground.com/profile/vince21/][img]http://sig.finalbattleground.com/p/10809.jpg[/img][/url]
[color=green][size=3]Office[/color][/size]
[url=http://www.n00bunlimited.net/hlstats/hlstats.php?mode=playerinfo&player=625][img]http://www.n00bunlimited.net/hlstats/sig-625-random.png[/img][/url]
well i think we should keep em the same, servers that stay populated don't seem to have a limit i.e. noob refuge, noob salad
i like awps, make the game more fun
Its only gay if you push back
I hate awps but n/u is all about awps and always will be. I am all about what is right for the community and makes people happy. I have no opnion on whether it should be restricted or not.
Just keep in mind we don't restrict them in office.
I don't want to start a debate about what is difference about the two servers, I was just saying.
[center][IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a205/tomca631/jackd_gif2.gif[/IMG][/center]
[center]U%|}[/center]
[center][COLOR="Red"]|Ň/Ú| siosios: thise 2 cab cgat at ne wgeb u waje yo ub ub the morning im too drunk right noiw[/COLOR][/center]
i say restrict 3 per team or 5 at the most
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
my opinion is in offiice its more close quarters for an MG to be able to stand a chance wit an AWP dust is a bit bigger just my opinion
Last edited by Mongoloid; 03-17-2010 at 07:47 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
that is a very good point Mongo.....
everyone keep the input and votes coming, thats what we need some good points on this so we can make a good decision for the best interests of the server and for all who play there.
Thanks....LaterZ.
Honestly..I could care less how many awps we have.
Yeah it may suck if u run a corner and somebody standing hundreds of feet away was camping shot u because they had a awp, but thats what N\U is.
Also some people suck at awp, so trained jookers can knife them even if they get a chance, joke pointing that out lol.
well anyways, im neutral of voting.
[IMG]http://i750.photobucket.com/albums/xx144/nessav214/Onehit-1-1.jpg[/IMG]
effshowٿ: you backstabber!
onehit420: backstabber?
effshowٿ: you started the orgie without me!
[url=http://www.gameservers.com/?ref=1642968][img]http://images.gameservers.com/image_13.gif[/img][/url]
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks